Talk:James Korris

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Article listed on WP:VFD Jul 10 to Jul 23 2004, consensus was not reached. Discussion:

Looks like a vanity page. Spectatrix 19:20, 2004 Jul 9 (UTC) Addendum: This page was originally on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old but moved here due to a deadlocked discussion. Johnleemk | Talk 14:30, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Well I don't imagine he wrote it. He seems to call himself Jim anyway. Whether he is worthy of an article is a different point. Secretlondon 01:00, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:23, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article isn't even about him, it's about the place he works. -- Cyrius| 01:23, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand: "james korris" gets 170 google hits, mostly for him, he has been interviewed by E! and he seems to be spending large sums of taxpayer money. Zocky 03:01, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • It sounds like a pretty major project, with some public and technical itnerest; he's been interviewed in Defense Week. Keep. FZ 15:44, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on James Korris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply