Talk:James Laidlaw Maxwell

Untitled

The main body of this article deserves a reference to China. Just because Taiwan was occupied by the Japanese doesn't mean that the culture ceased to be Chinese. It is widely recognized as part of China.Brian0324 19:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

That is extreme POV.--Jerry 22:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

It was certainly part of Qing China when Maxwell went there, but it's best to steer well clear of the modern controversy regarding Taiwan and China. Using the name Formosa (linked to Taiwan, with Taiwan hidden from initial view) would have been a best all round way to handle the matter, avoiding all references to the words, China, Japan, or Taiwan. In those days, British missionaries talked about going out to Formosa. Readers can then look up Formosa as a separate topic. I would also be inclined to remove the Chinese version of his name in the lead. Just because there is a statue of him in Taiwan with his name in Chinese, doesn't mean that we have to concern ourselves with his Chinese name on English wikipedia. Besides, I don't know what kind of Chinese the statute inscription is using, but I do know that nowadays they use Mandarin there, but in the 19th century, they spoke Taiwanese. Steer clear of all those minefields. 109.152.249.9 (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Laidlaw Maxwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311060228/http://www.pct.org.tw/english/2005news/new_2779_2.htm to http://www.pct.org.tw/english/2005news/new_2779_2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 14 December 2017 (UTC)