Talk:James M. Bennett

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Created article

edit

It would be a great to have a picture of JMB if possible.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Nonpartisan" cites

edit

The two cites used for non-partisan don't seem viable to me. One is to the organization's website, the other is to the subject's blog. At best, we could describe him as a "self-described non-partisan", but even that's a bit of a reach. Really need second party sources that describe him (not the organization) as non-partisan. Ravensfire (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. I'll keep looking. And I'm okay with keeping the tag on if you like. But the way I was looking at it was this: FairTax is nonpartisan (numerous sources confirm this -- they lobby both Democrats & Republicans). Bennett is an activist for FairTax. So QED isn't Bennett nonpartisan in his advocacy of FairTax? I'm not talking about things he may have done prior, or may do since, which aren't in conjunction with FairTax. Or, is there a solid source which puts Bennett's advocacy of FairTax as being decidedly Republican, or Democrat? --Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Combining information from two sources that way is called WP:SYNTH. No QED on Wikipedia! Not to mention it's some fairly faulty logic - just because he's a member of a non-partisan group doesn't mean that he is non-partisan. He supports FairTax, so he's definitely non-partisan there, but he's non-partisan with regards to individuals/groups he'll talk about FairTax. Honestly, I'd drop anything about him being non-partisan from the article. Cool with having the organization described that way, and that he's part of it. Trying to put that description on Bennett will require good sourcing and context. Ravensfire (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
My sense is: the statement "Bennett's advocacy of FairTax is nonpartisan" is bordering on the obvious. The group obviously wants to persuade both political parties. It describes itself repeatedly as nonpartisan. It doesn't identify with a political party. Bennett is a co-director of the group. My sense is you're making a huge fuss over a detail. I don't think it's any kind of a stretch or WP:SYNTH to use good common sense. Do you, yourself, really believe Bennett's advocacy of FairTax is partisan? I don't. Check out Bennett on Comcast television saying he's nonpartisan here (see 1:06) -- the moderator didn't disagree. But I agree there's a need to find an acceptable source affirming "Bennett is nonpartisan" and I think in time, surely, there will be.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James M. Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

  • Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.goleader.com/08jul17/05.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on James M. Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

James M. Bennett, Salisbury MD.

edit

When I searched on this name, was expecting James M. Bennett High School. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._Bennett_High_School

James M Bennett (Salisbury, MD) was a long term system superintendent, who had a school named after him.  (http://jmb.wcboe.org/about_us/history/mr__james_m__bennett)

(no relation I am aware of to person on article). Yet this person owns the article name: James M Bennett.

Should this be a "disambiguous" page?

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James M. Bennett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply