Talk:James Markham Ambler

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

James Markham Ambler

• ... that despite having an opportunity to leave the sunken USS Jeannette, James Markham Ambler (pictured) decided to stay and provide medical attention to the crew? Source: [1], [2]
  • ALT1: ... that due to the efforts of James Markham Ambler (pictured), Jeannette expedition became the first arctic expedition "without a single case of scurvy"? Source: https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fanb%2F9780198606697.article.2000022
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Burlington mayoral election
  • Comment: Created by Delqa on May 19. Expanded by me. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 21:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Created by Delqa (talk) and Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Nominated by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) at 21:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC).

• This article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and cites its sources. I am a little concerned about close paraphrasing from one source: [3]. Both hooks are cited within the article and are interesting to a broad audience. QPQ done. Other than the concern with paraphrasing this article is good to go. I invite a response from the nominator about the potential close paraphrasing and if the text of the article needs to be tweaked. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Trainsandotherthings: Thanks for the review. I made few changes, but most of the other paraphrasing appears to be case of WP:LIMITED, like name and titles of institutions. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
    • The article looks good to go now. Thanks for the changes. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
      • @Kavyansh.Singh: is the "without scurvy" bit a quote or a summary? The article and the hook don't seem to agree, and I can't access the source... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 08:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
        • @Theleekycauldron:: Hi! Added the quotes in the article; does it work? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
          • Howdy! indeed it does :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Markham Ambler/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 08:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I will be reviewing the article. Please allow 1-3 days for the assessment to be completed.

Notified

The nominator and noted co-nominator have been notified of the ongoing review.

Assessment

1. Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

2. Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	Check completed by Earwig	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

4. Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

5. Stability:

Notes	Result
No visible edit war	Pass

6. Illustration:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Comments

Thanks for taking the review, UnidentifiedX, I appreciate it. Let me know if you have any comments, and feel free to take your time. I might be a bit busy in the next two days, but we have @Delqa: as the co-nominator. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I want to ensure you are aware of what is going on regarding the review and its status. I have made a few edits and have added a few things to the article; I will continue to do so. I expect the review to be completed within the next 48 hours. Have a good day! UnidentifiedX (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I made some change in your suggested wording. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough. I just need to do the MoS check and then I’ll pass the article. In the meantime I’ll get something done about the orphan link Christopher J. Huggard - UnidentifiedX (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Conclusion

Congratulations! The article has passed the GA assessment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnidentifiedX (talk • contribs) 07:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)