This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Article is just silly and not worthy - but I will not be the one to nominate it for deletion (not my style). After all, there are plenty of wickos out there that get their jollies on finding crappy/nn articles (like this one) themselves and nominating it - it makes them feel really good in a wierd/sick way. ...It also makes them think they are making a small difference in the world and being an awesome wikipedian. Whoever is the lucky nominator will probably put the article down even more than I did (he/she will probably try to hurt the contributors feelings and try make article and article authors feel worthless. Dont forget, there are people that actually live to delete articles. Its a fact - they actually make a life out of it and even feel really good about themselves afterwords ...quickly repeating the process over and over (up to 20 times per day).
Start a discussion about improving the James Rhodes page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "James Rhodes" page.