Talk:James W. Lugenbeel
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from James W. Lugenbeel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Dr. Lugenbeel's journal became the only known record of the proceedings of the 1847 Liberian Constitutional Convention? Source: Dunn, Elwood D.; Beyan, Amos J.; Burrowes, Carl Patrick (2000). Historical Dictionary of Liberia. p. 85.
- Reviewed:
Created by RoundSquare (talk). Self-nominated at 21:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC).
- Not sure if it's appropriate to use "Dr. Lugenbeel" instead of his full name, as if "Dr. Lugenbeel" were some household name. Article generally seems OK, new and long enough, and appropriately referenced. Hook is interesting, though the convention should ideally be piped. Will return to this once QPQ is done. Best wishes Kingoflettuce (talk) 08:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: An alternate has been provided based on your comment. Also, isn't my QPQ obligation already fulfilled? It says that "nominators who have five or more DYK nominations must review another article", but this is only my second DYK nomination. RoundSquare (talk) 16:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that James W. Lugenbeel's journal became the only known record of the proceedings of the 1847 Liberian Constitutional Convention?
- Ok, didn't realise you were exempt. (for the offline sources) - would probably ditch the "Dr." in the hook, based on the general consensus on honorifics here. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Kingoflettuce: An alternate has been provided based on your comment. Also, isn't my QPQ obligation already fulfilled? It says that "nominators who have five or more DYK nominations must review another article", but this is only my second DYK nomination. RoundSquare (talk) 16:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)