Talk:Jamie Drysdale/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 18:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 17:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I will complete a review in the next couple of days. -Riley1012 (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
Great job on the prose, I have no suggestions here.

2. Verifiable
The article uses reliable sources and has a proper references section. Passes copyvio check

• Spot check:

• No issues: 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 17, 23, 26, 34, 40, 46, 50, 55, 65

3. Broad

• The youngest defenceman on the Otters that season, Drysdale told reporters that he hoped the team would "be competitive all year round". This sentence should be removed- the quote isn't providing anything interesting or new (presumably everyone would want their team to be competitive...)
  •  Partly done I swapped out that quote for a different one found farther down the article. I think it's still important to note that he was the youngest defenceman on the team even as a second-year juniors player, because that's not always the case.
• As a child, Drysdale wore No. 4 as a tribute to Bobby Orr, one of his father's favourite players. During his time in Anaheim, he was roommates with teammate Trevor Zegras. The first sentence can be moved to the Early life section, and the second sentence can be removed entirely. The Personal life section should be deleted unless there's more information you can add.
  •  Done

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
The article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
The image used is free use and has a relevant caption.

GhostRiver (talk · contribs) I've completed my review; let me know if you have any questions. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: Pinging again since it has been a week. I noticed you're on a wikibreak of sorts, so I am willing to keep this open until you're back. I hope all is well. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Also just realizing I forgot to put the article on hold, will do that now. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping, letting you know I've seen the edits and will address them as soon as I have the brainpower. — GhostRiver 05:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Riley1012: Comments addressed. — GhostRiver 05:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, I will pass this article. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.