Talk:Jamie Proctor
Jamie Proctor has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 5, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Jamie Proctor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jamie Proctor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140802074454/http://www.football-league.co.uk/staticFiles/4e/bd/0%2C%2C10794~179534%2C00.pdf to http://www.football-league.co.uk/staticFiles/4e/bd/0%2C%2C10794~179534%2C00.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jamie Proctor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged.
- What makes the following reliable sources?
prostinternational.com- Seems like a reasonable enough media website. The article is a direct interview with Proctor himself so the information is from the man himself.--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Actually it seems to be a work experience program for students but it looks like it has oversight so struck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Seems like a reasonable enough media website. The article is a direct interview with Proctor himself so the information is from the man himself.--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- sbnation.com -- seems to be a fan community
- I've just removed that line.--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like there's still a citation using it? FN 85, used twice. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I've corrected that now.--EchetusXe 10:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've just removed that line.--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
"Rotherham had cover as they had already signed strikers Freddie Ladapo and Carlton Morris earlier in the transfer window": what does "cover" mean here?- They already had players in that position. I've rephrased it.--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Those are the only issues. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks!--EchetusXe 12:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC):
- Looks good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 16:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- ... that Jamie Proctor won Port Vale's Goal of the Season award after scoring a scissor-kick volley (pictured) against Sutton United? Source: However, there was only ever going to be one winner, as Jamie Proctor won the award for his outstanding scissor-kick volley against Sutton United at Vale Park.
Improved to Good Article status by EchetusXe (talk). Self-nominated at 15:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC).
- The article has been promoted to GA status. It is neutral, uses inline citations and I cannot see any copyright violations. The hook is good and cited in the Career/Port Vale section of the article. The image is free, and used within the article. QPQ has been done. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @EchetusXe and JuneGloom07: I can't find the source that specifically calls this kick a "flying volley"? If that could be cited in the article, that would be appreciated :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, scissor-kick is more accurate and better sourced, so let's just use that phrase.EchetusXe 18:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Happy to go with scissor-kick volley too. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, scissor-kick is more accurate and better sourced, so let's just use that phrase.EchetusXe 18:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- @EchetusXe and JuneGloom07: I can't find the source that specifically calls this kick a "flying volley"? If that could be cited in the article, that would be appreciated :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Spotchecks
editEchetusXe, I realized after I completed the GA review that I should have done some spotchecks as part of the review. I've done a few, and have found a couple of issues:
- FN 16 cites "Proctor was on the fringes of the "Lilywhites" first-team squad during the 2010–11 season and had to wait until the last game of the season to score his first senior goal in a 3–1 win against Watford at Deepdale, by which stage Preston's relegation into League One had already been confirmed after a disappointing season under the management of Phil Brown." As far as I can see there's no mention of Phil Brown in the source.
- FN 17 cites "Proctor was injured with a double hernia in October 2011." The source just says a hernia, not a double hernia. FN 6 does say double hernia so you could just add that.
- FN 25 cites "He made his "Shrews" debut the next day, playing 90 minutes in a 2–2 draw with Colchester United at the New Meadow." The source covers the game but doesn't mention that Proctor played.
These are all pretty minor, but given there are three of them I checked about another fifteen or twenty and found no other issues. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Okay thanks I've updated those bits.--EchetusXe 10:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fixes all look good; thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)