Wikipedia

Talk:Jamyi Witch hiring controversy/Archive 1

< Talk:Jamyi Witch hiring controversy
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

BLP/POV/OR on scandal/persecution

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

None of the sources were calling this a scandal, or an instance of religious persecution. As there are two named individuals who would be the perpetrators of such acts, that is a BLP issue as well. I have rewritten a bit to reduce that problem. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

Latest comment: 10 years ago10 comments6 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wisconsin witch hunt → Jamyi Witch hiring controversy – None of the sources use the phrase "Wisconsin witch hunt". Only one source uses "Witch hunt" - "It started out as a simple job search. But it turned into a witch hunt.Make that a Witch hunt." Clearly a joke about the persons name and not a title of the incident. further, the title is a WP:OR spin, a great deal of the WP:RS are talking about a controversy. It is not the controversy of the "hunt" but rather the controversy of the hiring (said controversy's most visible part being the hunt). Especially considering the content of the article a few revisions back, the title seems like it was part of a BLP violation, the majority of which has already been cleaned up. Now its time for the title Gaijin42 (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

BarrelProof typo/brainfart. Fixed. Thanks. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Further corrected, assuming unintentional letter swapping —BarrelProof (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jamyi Witch hiring controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jamyi_Witch_hiring_controversy/Archive_1&oldid=1090396723"