Talk:Jan Mazurkiewicz/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Harrison49 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- References are reliable sources and well placed.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- The article covers the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- It maintains a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- All images are within the public domain.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Informative captions are used. Consider moving the names of those in each photograph to separate footnotes.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: