Talk:Janet Lane-Claypon
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Janet Lane-Claypon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 3 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Evanderford.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editThis is a fascinating article but some of the material is plagiarized. For example, this entire paragraph is taken verbatim from the Breast Cancer Action newsletter, without attribution: "Woven through all of these reports are Lane-Claypon’s scrupulous and prescient concerns about the drawbacks and uncertainties that her own methodology exposed. Sidebar discussions reveal an extraordinarily rigorous and subtle intelligence at work. In the end-results study just mentioned, Lane-Claypon acknowledges the difficulties involved in deriving an accurate staging of the disease (in the days before routine diagnostic biopsies). She understood that differences in access to health care (and hence to surgical treatment) would influence survival results. She recognized the problems of bias created by limiting the study to survivors and by relying on the recall of breast cancer patients themselves rather than observing (with greater neutrality and potentially greater accuracy) the experience of newly diagnosed women going through treatment and beyond. Finally, in reviewing the family histories of her cases, she anticipated the role that genes might play in the development of breast cancer. 'There appear to be some families,' she wrote, 'in which for reasons not certain at present, cancer plays havoc with the members, and there is (some) slight evidence in some instances that it attacks the same organs.'"
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Janet Lane-Claypon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927091918/http://www.bcaction.org/Pages/SearchablePages/2004Newsletters/Newsletter081C.html to http://www.bcaction.org/Pages/SearchablePages/2004Newsletters/Newsletter081C.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Dealing with copyvio
editThe plagiarised text was apparently added in 2006, with this diff. I am willing to take a run at paraphrasing content from the original source, but have limited time until about August 5. I would welcome the help of other editors on this article about a very worthy and notable woman. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)