Wikipedia

Talk:January 2009 North American ice storm/Archive 1

< Talk:January 2009 North American ice storm
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

Was this a notable storm?

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I think despite the seriousness of this storm, it was not notable enough to warrant an article because it lacks the significance of why it is a notable storm. I know it hit a large portion of the United States, but does it make it noteworthy of an article? I hate to sound like a hardnosed person, but it wasn't that notable of a winter storm. There were far more significant storms and some of those don't have articles, but why does this? 71.10.171.130 (talk) 03:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

There were 65 fatalities, in this day and age in the United States, 65 people being killed from a winter storm is very significant. Cyclonebiskit 20:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, maybe you do not think it was notable because you didn't live through it. Loosing your electricity for a week is no laughing matter, and when thousands upon thousands do, it is serious. Kentucky called up the entire National Guard. --Bub Bidderskins (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

It was a pretty amazing weather event. Seeing a medium sized city like mine (100,000+) come to a complete halt, absolutely devastated and impassible, was very wild. On a side note: the author of this article MUST use some paragraphs to break the article up. It's unreadable in its current format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.214.81 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 2009 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on January 2009 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on January 2009 North American ice storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:January_2009_North_American_ice_storm/Archive_1&oldid=1153043197"