Talk:Japan–Korea Joint Development Zone

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Edge3 (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that despite the Japan–Korea Joint Development Zone containing "prolific" oil reserves, none has been produced to date? Source: https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article-abstract/22/1/149/7150776?login=false
  • ALT1: ... that some in South Korea has accused Japan of waiting until the agreement for the Japan–Korea Joint Development Zone expires to claim the waters for themselves? Source: https://thediplomat.com/2023/02/keep-an-eye-on-the-japan-korea-joint-development-zone/
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mandera Prison

Created by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Japan–Korea Joint Development Zone; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems: - one issue

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Johnson524: Good article. Though, while the hook says "that South Korea has accused Japan of" while the cited source says "Some in South Korea accuse Tokyo of" which doesn't seem like the exact same. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Onegreatjoke:, does changing this wording fix the issue, or is there something else I'm missing. Cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 00:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

changing the wording would be appreciated. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke:  Done Johnson524 (Talk!) 04:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

I need to see the hook changed too. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: It should be done already Johnson524 (Talk!) 01:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm talking about how the hook says "that South Korea has accused Japan of" while the source says "Some in South Korea accuse Tokyo of" Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: I am very sorry and don't mean to be difficult, but I believe I did change the hook in an edit a little while back, which is why I asked originally if changing this wording fixed the issue. I apologize if I'm misunderstanding Johnson524 (Talk!) 22:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Guess i failed to explain it correctly. I wasn't talking about changing to japan to tokyo (I personally prefer japan). I was talking about how the hook outright said south korea when the source ""Some in South Korea" so that's what I was pointing out. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke: Ohhhhh, my bad.  Done and changed Tokyo back to Japan, because I also prefer this wording 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 23:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Better. Would like to see this in the article too. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke:  Done – and thanks again for your patience! Johnson524 (Talk!) 23:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Irredentism category

Johnson524, irredentism almost exclusively focuses on territorial claims. Why do you believe this article's subject is irredentist? Vacosea (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@Vacosea: Just because it is almost exclusively. If you are passionate about it, feel free to remove it. Cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 19:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)