Talk:Japan–Taiwan relations

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Title

edit

I have moved the article back to "Japan-Taiwan relations" as Japan does not recognise the Republic of China in any way. To talk about "ROC-Japan" relations is misleading, as there are no relations with the ROC. Japan has relations with the island known as "Taiwan" - no more. John Smith's (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Japan DOES have (unofficial) relations with the Republic of China, Smith. The ROC is a government. Japan in this context refers to the government. The ROC also governs Pescadores, Kinmen, and Matsu. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If "Republic of China" is to be used, the "(Taiwan)" modifier needs to be included to lessen confusion about which country is being described. Many people don't know that the official name of Taiwan is "Republic of China" and might think the article has something to do with China. Readin (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Treaty of Taipei

edit

This line "By recognizing the PRC, Japan nullified the Treaty of Taipei in relation to the Republic of China." looks to me like an attempt to argue a point, not an objective statement. Is there any reliable neutral source for it? I'm yanking it until such a source can be found.Readin (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Treaty of Taipei is an outdated source, basically nobody cares about that piece of paper anymore, because it is no longer in effect and working, like the Joint Defense Treaty between USA and ROC during the Cold War. Please do not tell me the feeling of Cold War is better so you support the existence of the TOT and JDT. If any politician wants to fool the public by citing Treaty of Taipei to provide a statement that ROC in terms of international law have Taiwan, it proves how ancient and outdated his brain is. Japan changed the recipient of Taiwan from ROC to PRC after PRC-Japan established formal diplomacy and both signed official paper about Taiwan's belonging at the same time TOT was abrogated by Japan and TOT became nullified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.174.134.224 (talk) 16:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

stationary

edit

Does anybody have any idea what "stationary" means in the following phrase? "and Japan led the logistic/artillery stationary production/manufacturing to support United States in the Korean War" Is it a misspelling of stationery, and it means that Japan supplied writing materials, or is it just a word which should be removed? Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll go ahead and remove the word "stationary". Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 23:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Belize–Republic of China relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japan–Taiwan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japan–Taiwan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply