Talk:Japanese cruiser Tokiwa
Japanese cruiser Tokiwa has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doubts as for date
editIt does not seem possible, that she was laid down in January 1898 and launched on 6 July the same year. One Russian book says she was laid down on 6 January 1897 ((А.С. Александров, С.А. Балакин: „Асама” и другие. Японские броненосные крейсера программы 1895-1896г.), series Morskaya Kampania 1/2006 Pibwl ←« 00:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct - there was a typo on the date, which is now fixed. --MChew (talk) 06:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting, that 1898 appears in very many publications... Pibwl ←« 00:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese cruiser Tokiwa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 16:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- One dupe link in the lead
- Watch ENGVAR, I see armor and armour
- I'd probably pipe the link to Steregushchiy so it matches the other ships mentioned in the article.
- "Tokiwa was third of six when..." - I know you're talking about Togo's line, but most will not.
- Added "in line", but I'm not sure if I should clarify that it's of the 2nd Division. What do you think?
- You could also pipe line of battle in - though I saw another reference to this earlier in the article, so the link should probably go there.
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- You could also pipe line of battle in - though I saw another reference to this earlier in the article, so the link should probably go there.
- Added "in line", but I'm not sure if I should clarify that it's of the 2nd Division. What do you think?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Probably ought to give some context on the arrival of the 2nd Pacific Squadron - otherwise, readers will assume it's the ships from Port Arthur and Vladivostok
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Japanese cruiser Tokiwa.jpg - need a source for this
- Could find a source on Google image, but I'm not to concerned about this since it's obviously a postcard.
- File:Japanese cruiser Tokiwa.jpg - need a source for this
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for looking this over; now I've got to go and make changes to all the other articles from which I copy-pasted major sections! I think that I've dealt with all your comments, let me know if there's anything that I missed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Japanese cruiser Tokiwa. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/Review/2000/winter/art3-w00.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)