Talk:Japanese destroyer Kaki (1944)

Japanese destroyer Kaki (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 13, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:33, November 8, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Kaki (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 14:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this. Harrias ^talk 14:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

References and images

References are consistently formatted in an appropriate style to reliable sources.
The image is appropriately licensed and captioned.

Prose

As with Talk:Japanese destroyer Nire (1944)/GA1, could you add "length" after "overall" at the start of Design and description.
I'm a bit confused about the fact that: "She was turned over to Allied forces at the time of the surrender of Japan", and then "Kaki was turned over to the United States on 4 July". Was she turned over to the United States from one of the other Allies? Or is it implicit in her being "disarmed and used to repatriate Japanese personnel in 1945–1947" that she was given back to Japan during this time? Whichever way, the article could do with a bit of clarity.
- I'm not sure what the status was of the surrendered ships that were used to repatriate service members. I do know that they were Japanese administered and manned. Legally speaking, they probably belonged to the Allies as a whole and were then divvied up between them once everybody was back home, but that's just my guess. I've glossed over all that and have reworded both the lede and the main body accordingly. See how well that works.
Another slight inconsistency: the infobox says "Turned over to the US Navy, 12 April 1947", while the article says 4 July.

Otherwise, nothing much to complain about here. Harrias ^talk 14:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

With those minor changes, I'm happy that this meets the GA criteria. Harrias ^talk 16:34, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic