Talk:Jar'Edo Wens hoax
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Screenshot
editI think a screenshot of the hoax article should be added. I would be bold but I'm in doubt. --TL22 (talk) 23:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- How about this instead? Brycehughes (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm, the archive seems to be a better option. Let's keep it like this. --TL22 (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jar'Edo Wens hoax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709193621/http://internet.gawker.com/how-one-man-made-himself-into-an-aboriginal-god-with-wi-1692426415 to http://internet.gawker.com/how-one-man-made-himself-into-an-aboriginal-god-with-wi-1692426415
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Your participation is appreciated at Talk:Reliability of Wikipedia!
edit
FYI: There is a proposal to merge this article with Reliability of Wikipedia. Your input at the appropriate discussion would be greatly appreciated. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)