Talk:Jason Villalba
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editNo, I don't know Mr. Villalba and had not realized the article is written with a point of view favorable to him. I will revise it. Thanks, Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On March 10, 2015, Villalba introduced a bill that criminalizes photographing, recording, or documenting police officers from closer than 25 feet, or 100 feet if photographer has a concealed handgun license. Exceptions are made only for registered representatives of major new media organizations.[19] The bill, House Bill 2918, may be unconstitutional in light of the 2011 U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruling, Glik v. Cunniffe, which states that citizens have right to record police in action.[20] The bill has been described as follows: "Villalba’s bill would also make it illegal for private citizens to record their own interactions with police officers. In fact, the language is so broad, in prohibiting “documenting” the police officer’s activities, that taking notes during a conversation with an officer, about what was being said, the officer’s badge number, etc., could be construed as a violation."[21] After heavy criticism about the bill on social media, he became the subject of a Dallas Observer blog about his blocking on Twitter of critics or even reporters asking questions.[22]
The the sentences: 19, 20 and 21 should be removed from the page. They are unhelpful and were written solely to cause controversy. The source is not reliable and should not have had access to change the page or make the page inaccessible to others. This bill is in the process of being altered making all of this information invalid. In addition, this bill is not unconstitutional. Lastly, there are grammatical mistakes throughout. Jordanhunter919 (talk) 15:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: Please provide third party reliable sources to support your claim Mlpearc (open channel) 21:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Eric Nicholson of the Dallas Observer stated that Villalba proposed the amendment in "direct response to Plano's new LGBT protections"[18] This is incorrectly cited and is inaccurate information. Jordanhunter919 (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Jason Villalba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927234605/http://www.dmagazine.com/Home/D_Magazine/2012/October/Is_Jason_Villalba_the_Future_of_the_Texas_GOP.aspx to http://www.dmagazine.com/Home/D_Magazine/2012/October/Is_Jason_Villalba_the_Future_of_the_Texas_GOP.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108172637/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108172637/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108172637/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108172637/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)