Talk:Jasraj/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Curb Safe Charmer in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Comments I'm going to have to quick fail this as it is currently tagged with a dispute notice relating to lack of references. I will, however, give you some basic comments on things you'll need to address (as well as the tag) before re-nominating.

  • "8 Dec 2016" expand dates out.
  Done
  • You mention (and red link) "Pandit Motiram" after you've already referred to him as simply Motiram. Should be the other way round.
  Done
  • "happened in this environment...." not encyclopedic tone and needs ref.
  Removed
  • It is vitally important to ensure that all awards are referenced reliably, we simply can't attribute awards without verification to an individual.
  Done
  • Discog is completely unreferenced and given that all but one of the items listed aren't even red-linked, there's practically no chance of our readers verifying this information.
  Done

Good luck with future endeavours. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Many thanks for reviewing and for your useful comments. I will work on those. Regarding the tag, this was added by Dharmadhyaksha. I asked him on the article talk page to be specific as to which statements needed further sourcing, but I didn't ping him (as I thought he was about to do a review and so would see it) and he's not replied. If the issue is the discography section, this is already supported by a general reference. How should I apply a reference that sources the whole of a section, rather than line by line? Can the awards section be referenced to the official Jasraj website or would they need to all be third party? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
If all discog entries are supported then an easy way to include that is something like "Source:[1]" at the top of the section. As for awards, yes, it would be inappropriate to use a primary source for awards, third party RS would be by far the most appropriate way ahead. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I though you were being sarcastic in asking whats unsourced. There are sections unsourced. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Dharmadhyaksha: Awards and discography are were sourced in the general references. Curb Safe Charmer (talk)
(section citations now moved to top of the sections) Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply