Talk:Jastrebarsko children's camp/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 04:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Review

• Section 1; para 1; sentence 1; In the end "government since April 1941" doesn't flow with the sentence. I mean that I cannot get that connected with the rest of the sentence.
• Section 1; para 1; sentence 2; I think it is to be "between April 1941 and June 1942", not "between April 1941 until June 1942".
• Section 2; para 2; sentence 1; Consider replacing "collect" with "gather", a better alternative. Collecting children is a bit awkward, whereas gathering is somewhat better. Other alternatives include amass, accumulate.
• Section 3.1; sentence 1; What is "Jablanac", a place or a camp? Please clarify and also link it, if the article is available.
• Section 3.1; The same above suggestion goes for "Mlaka" and "Gornji Reka" in the following sentences. Link these on the first mention.
• Section 3.1; It is mentioned that "The last transport arrived from Gornji Reka on 14 August with 150 boys", are these 150 completely boys or children,please reconfirm it.
• Section 3.3; Link "solitary confinement".
• Section 3.3; Instead of "none of the Ustaše guards or nuns", "neither the Ustaše guards nor the nuns" may be used, a better alternative.
• Section 3.3; I think it must be "Another survivor Mihajlo Veljić" not just "The survivor Mihajlo Veljić".
• Section 3.4; I suggest replacing "in improving the conditions in which the children lived" with "in improving the living conditions of the children".
• Section 3.5; Correct "July, 26" to "26 July", to maintain consistency, because throughout the para it was DD-Month.
• Section 5; para 2; I think it must be "He said that they took him from", not just "He said they took him from", third person narrative.
• Lead; I suggest splitting it into two for an article of this length.
• Please add |liberated_by parameter to the infobox as it is clearly available from the sources and mentioned is the prose. I suggest adding something about the liberation in the lead also.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

G'day Krishna, thanks for the review. I have addressed all your comments, except for the one about "collect", which I think is the right word in the context. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

No worries, I just thought it would be better. Got the point. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

@Peacemaker67: Could please suggest under what category of Warfare good articles must this placed? I am just confused between "Fortifications and military installations" and "Massacres, war crimes, and legal issues of warfare". Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:46, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Massacres, war crimes, and legal issues of warfare would be best, I think. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)