Talk:Javelina Formation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Javelina Formation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paleobiota help
editCode
editThis section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.
Premade rowspans:
| rowspan="2" |
| rowspan="3" |
| rowspan="4" |
| rowspan="5" |
| rowspan="6" |
| rowspan="7" |
Replacement headings for "Presence" column
! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material
Replacement headings for "Taxa" column
Cell background colors
editThe background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; |
Red for reclassified and preoccupied
|style="background:#fbdddb;" |
Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:
|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |
Dark grey for discredited taxa:
|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |
Peach for Ichnotaxa:
|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |
Light blue for Ootaxa:
|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |
Light green for Morphotaxa:
|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |
add ref.
editCan someone please add this reference to the Javelina Formation page? Thanks!
Hunt, ReBecca K. and Thomas M. Lehman. 2008. Attributes of the ceratopsian dinosaur Torosaurus, and new material from the Javelina Formation (Maastrichtian) of Texas. Journal of Paleontology 82(6): 1127-1138. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinochick (talk • contribs) 00:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Tyrannosaurs
editDaspletosaurus and Tyrannosaurus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.114.76 (talk) 00:24, 20 November 2013 (UTC) I re-checked the reference on Daspletasaurus and tracked down a new reference for Tyrannosaurus, everything checks out. 01:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly one or both of these is misclassified. Daspletosaurus is so over lumped it's basically a form taxon at this point... MMartyniuk (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- It could be, but I only did skimmed to confirm that each genus was actually mentioned as being found in the javelina. Ryan shell (talk) 23:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Probably some random tyrannosaur fragments put in Daspletosaurus for some reason.142.176.114.76 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- It could be, but I only did skimmed to confirm that each genus was actually mentioned as being found in the javelina. Ryan shell (talk) 23:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly one or both of these is misclassified. Daspletosaurus is so over lumped it's basically a form taxon at this point... MMartyniuk (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)