Talk:Jay Foreman (comedian)
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Jay Foreman (comedian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090515142946/http://www.jayforeman.co.uk:80/who to http://www.jayforeman.co.uk/who/
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090509100220/http://www.musicalcomedy.co.uk:80/news to http://www.musicalcomedy.co.uk/news
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110513144734/http://www.parliament.uk:80/education/online-resources/videos/the-general-election-xplained/ to http://www.parliament.uk/education/online-resources/videos/the-general-election-xplained/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Episode list
editI believe we should remove the YouTube episode lists because they are unnecessary and give extra weight to these particular video series. Other notable YouTubers do not normally have these types of episode lists for YouTube only series. Also this list keeps getting removed by various editors so I think it would be suitable to reach a consensus. SterlingPound4 (talk) 13:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)SterlingPound4 (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @SterlingPound4, I fully agree and Done ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 03:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Jay Foreman photo
editIs it copyrighted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SterlingPound4 (talk • contribs)
user:92.23.210.62, claims to be the wife of Jay Foreman, which would make it not copyrighted. Sahaib3005 (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Sahaib3005, it would still be copyrighted but licensed, I'm disputing the status of the photo though as I don't think there's enough evidence, and if it was added by the wife then a WP:COI should've been declared by the editor themselves. ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 03:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
COI tag (October 2021)
editI think there's definitely something fishy going on with this article, with long lists of unnotable awards, edits from somebody claiming to be his wife who says "we strongly dislike the photo of him in the red shirt" (see Special:Contributions/92.23.210.62), along with most edits here being from unregistered accounts or IPs, I think a COI tag is worthy here, at least until a rewrite happens. ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 03:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ed6767: Hi, according to Jay Foreman himself, it is his wife and they'd like the current photo removed from the article. Here's proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palkia3030 (talk • contribs)
- Palkia3030, that's good news! Better images are needed, but we can't just take people's word for saying who they say they are so removal and deletion is standard procedure to be on the safe side. If you have direct email contact with Foreman, you should direct him to email permissions-commons wikimedia.org with the appropriate images and license release so that they can be uploaded to Commons without issue (see commons:Commons:Volunteer Response Team for more info). Hope this helps. ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 01:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Update request
editpls update the pic i really need it DoraTheMora (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)