Talk:Jay Scott

Baron Munchausen (1988) Review

I found a summary of Mr. Scott's review of The Adventures of Baron Munchausen on metacritic [1] and became curious about him as he rated it 0/100 and the next lowest score is 60/100. It may not be particularly relevant to his biography but I was wondering if anyone has a copy of his full review of the film because I am curious why he rated it so low or what criteria his numeric rating was based on.

Please excuse my curiousity if it seems out of place but it could prove an important piece of information about the film or the critic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.217.64 (talk) 05:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Pueblo Painting

He also wrote a beautiful book about Puelo-Indian painting.--Radh (talk) 14:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Jay Scott

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jay Scott's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Variety":

• From To Live and Die in L.A. (film): "To Live and Die in L.A.". Variety. November 1, 1985. Retrieved August 8, 2013.
• From Tron: "Tron". Variety. January 1, 1982. Archived from the original on 2012-09-15. Retrieved 2008-07-09. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)