Talk:Jean-Michel Parasiliti di Para

How come...

a kingdom has a reigning prince? Should not he be a King? --Damián A. Fernández Beanato (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

In real the is no prince, no king and even no kingdom at all. --Otberg (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

But some people like the single purpose account User:Garden of Edith are big supporters of this nonsense fake kingdom: [1] --Otberg (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you have a reference for this being a "nonsense fake kingdom"? Because there are many supporting the fact that it is unrecognized, not fictitious. To be fictitious (ie: from a film, novel, etc.), it would have to be from a work of fiction, not have a real-world history with a leader believing they truly reign over the area. The difference, and wording, is important. --Garden of Edith (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

It is obviously time to report this single purpose account for editwar. --Otberg (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Fascinating. I was going to say the same about your account. My edits have been constructive and sourced. Yours rely on your interpretation of "fiction", which isn't actually correct. It seems you have an agenda on this article (and others having to do with micronations) based on your edit history. --Garden of Edith (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Fascinating. Your your only mission in WP is pushing this fake monarchy. --Otberg (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)