Talk:Jean Parisot de Valette
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jean Parisot de Valette article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ch
editcuuc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.11.101.248 (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
"Name controversy" section
editThis section has been blanked a number of times. Can anything be done about it? Xwejnusgozo (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Because that's not clear. This article take the option of one judge who said that the Grand Master called himself and signed Jean de Valette. So we should use this name. But that's a bit odd because his ancestors were de La Valette, without adding the worst that if we decide to follow the lonely Giovanni Bonello's point of view, the article should renamed Jean de Valette and not Jean Parisot de Valette, as he never used Parisot himself, well according to Bonello's research. A consensus is obviously needed here, especially when German, French and Italian articles refers to him as de La Valette. My opinion is the article should include the both names and not only one. Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus is called Pompey by everybody, Gaius Julius Caesar is called Julius Caesar by everybody, Richard I Plantagenet is called Richard the Lionheart by everybody, I can with reason doubt they called themselves Pompey, Julius Caesar and Lionheart. 92.129.120.223 (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jean Parisot de Valette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111113211958/http://www.orderofmalta.int/history/680/the-79-grand-masters/?lang=en to http://www.orderofmalta.int/history/680/the-79-grand-masters/?lang=en
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)