Talk:Jedlice, Opole Voivodeship
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ActivelyDisinterested in topic Generic history about the area, not the village
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Generic history about the area, not the village
editI can't see that such a large section on the history of the area is due. The information is more about the area than the history of this specific village. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- So the village was independent and didn't lied in any state? This is withhelding of relevant information. Especially as it's a foundation of Prussians. --Jonny84 (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's a tiny village, it doesn't need the full history bof Prussia. We have whole articles for that. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- also I was just coming here to notify that I've moved the discussion here - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also small villages have a history.. Then we should also erase all other location informations in consequence. --Jonny84 (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- First of all it didn't descriped the full history or even the history of Prussia as you are suggesting. So why are claiming wrong statements? Indeed it mentioned the territorial belonging and history of the village, I'd corrected the wrong German place name and I mentioned the century of foundation. All this was reverted by you.. --Jonny84 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jonny84 - for the record, I also think that you should not keep entering the same text into multiple articles of the tiny villages. - GizzyCatBella🍁 00:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- So instead of historic facts, which are correct, you are suggesting, that I should think up different stories to keep it diverse? --Jonny84 (talk) 00:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Can we please move this conversation here, as previously discussed a small village article is not really the proper forum. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 00:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- So instead of historic facts, which are correct, you are suggesting, that I should think up different stories to keep it diverse? --Jonny84 (talk) 00:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jonny84 - for the record, I also think that you should not keep entering the same text into multiple articles of the tiny villages. - GizzyCatBella🍁 00:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- First of all it didn't descriped the full history or even the history of Prussia as you are suggesting. So why are claiming wrong statements? Indeed it mentioned the territorial belonging and history of the village, I'd corrected the wrong German place name and I mentioned the century of foundation. All this was reverted by you.. --Jonny84 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also small villages have a history.. Then we should also erase all other location informations in consequence. --Jonny84 (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)