Talk:Jeep Hurricane

Advertisement?

The article has been revised for a more neutral POV. Should the advertisement indicator be removed?

Looks fine to me. I don't see why not. --Bky1701 21:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

I was going to remove the notice, but then I realized there is nothing about the vehicle other than a discussion of its strengths and "most fun" award. Can someone perhaps add info on why it's not about to enter production? --Orthografer 18:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

a picture would be nice as well

It was only a concept so it won't go into production.IG-2000 07:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

That and the fact that it has two hemis and all the complicated steering would drive up the price to the point where the few that could be sold still wouldn't cover the production/development costs. It might have been released for production if it were made by some specialty company but DC is more concerned about mass production and mass sales. The previous is all speculation on my part though, I have no sources to back this up but it seems logical to me. Dismas|^(talk) 09:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Removed Advertisement layout style

I fixed the article so it doesn't read like a manufacture's car brochure (or advertisement, which is not allowed), plus added references. I also added a better pic of the Hurricane.IG-2000 07:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Still messy

Less an advert, but still like a press release. Repetition, speculation and unencyclopedic phrasing. I've had a go:

• Monocoque/unitary construction is currently the normal style of car construction, and has been for decades.

• Retaining Jeep's traditional grille is not noteworthy, and in any case it is evident from the pictures.

• Modified 'mode of entry' explanation, removing 'Dukes of Hazzard' reference.

I was tempted to remove one of the last two images, as being too similar to one another. Centrepull (talk) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)