Talk:Jeff Gilberthorpe

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Hamiltonstone in topic Question notability and accuracy

this artist has sold millions of dollars worth of paintings, has exhibited all over the world for over twenty years, currently has two books published and at least three more to be published in the coming years. This makes him a notable subject by any standard.

The article is correctly sourced to wiki standards, correctly formatted and follows all of wikis standards and practices.

The person proposing the deletion has offered no reason for the deletion other than "procedural nom" which is nonsense, as pointed out by cother comments.

There seems to be no reason at all to delete this article.

File:Timeforamontage.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Timeforamontage.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Wik.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Wik.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Wik.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Question notability and accuracy

edit

I question that the subject meets WP notability guidlines, and can find almost no citations online for anything in this article. One book by this man appears to be real, but looks suspiciously like it is self-published by a tiny local holding company that has no website, and no other activities - except possibly being Mr Gilberthorpe's company. I would welcome evidence from other editors that establishes notability through reliable sources; otherwise we should take this to AfD. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 13:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply