Talk:Jeff Gillooly
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Nonstopdrivel in topic A little bit of editorializing here?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Trivia
editI've removed what I think was a pointless bit of trivia about some bit Leno may have done one night in his monologue. If there was anything more to it than that, feel free to restore and embellish it, but otherwise, I don't think it was relevant to the article. -Chinju 07:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- It's as relevant as Jeff himself was. Wahkeenah 13:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
A little bit of editorializing here?
editAnyone else think this is a little over-the-top: "Gillooly achieved a modicum of notoriety when a sex tape surfaced of him and Tonya Harding on their wedding night. Harding was seen effortlessly enveloping her new husband's strikingly large penis." I think he had a modicum of notoriety before the tape, and the rest seems like a, shall we say, subjective statement. --Jwikijay 01:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is extremely hard to make me laugh, but for some reason this had me wiggling helplessly on the couch, roiled by peals of laughter. I think it was the incongruous combination of a wildly inappropriate comment coupled (no pun intended) with an amazingly understated, professional appraisal of the comment. It's so hilarious, I almost wish it could stay in the article, though this incident does underscore the intrinsic vulnerability of Wikipedia. --Nonstopdrivel 23:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)