Talk:Jeff Smith (Missouri politician)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jeff Smith (Missouri politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110417015348/http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/2122724-paternity-fraud-reform-introduced-in-the-missouri-senate to http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/2122724-paternity-fraud-reform-introduced-in-the-missouri-senate
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220005720/http://www.maketherealdadpay.org/?p=53 to http://www.maketherealdadpay.org/?p=53
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110417015348/http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/2122724-paternity-fraud-reform-introduced-in-the-missouri-senate to http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/2122724-paternity-fraud-reform-introduced-in-the-missouri-senate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Criminal Conviction Subsection Tone

I hadn't heard about Jeff Smith in years, and came across his name today. Looking at this article (and BTW I don't know any details about whatever crimes he apparently was convicted of), the section in it about his conviction not only gives scant information about whatever he allegedly did, but the tone makes it obvious that whoever wrote this section was strongly in Smith's camp. It isn't explained what Smith's role was in the whole affair, and most of it is a description of reasons why Smith deserved (and yet didn't often get) lenient treatment. A more neutral perspective is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.82.7 (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Came on here to agree with the above. Shocked at how poorly this page is written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:6080:3F00:51C8:82B6:EB7C:6E54 (talk) 23:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I’m fairly certain that this entire article is a promo piece—this convicted criminal forged a career upon his prison release as an author, writing a faux-virtue signaling, I’m-a-victim-not-a-crook book about the supposed state of affairs among our prison systems. The whole piece reads like a CV, with an obligatory, defense attorney-approved section on his criminal conduct, indictment, the supposed overreaches of the court and his excessive sentencing. He held a brief term as a Missouri senator, and otherwise has done nothing particularly noteworthy. I think it should be marked for review, and hopefully, deletion. Alanrobts (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

To add to the above, the user who wrote this article originally is from Missouri, and suspiciously launched their account in 2008–right in the middle of Mr. Smith’s term in the Missouri legislature. I’m just sayin… Alanrobts (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

I’m going to proceed with a deep-dive into Mr. Smith’s criminal history and edit the section accordingly, as warranted. Alanrobts (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)