Talk:Jefferson National Forest (Montana)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jefferson National Forest (Montana). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6ENvCUJPk?url=http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf to http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6ENvCUJPk?url=http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf to http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

hatnotes not necessary on unambiguous titles

@Acroterion: Re: this edi: Per WP:NOTAMB, There is no need to direct readers to other articles that have a similar name when the title already unambiguous. Hatnotes should generally only be placed when the title someone may have clicked on is reasonably ambiguous, in order to direct them to the intended article with the more obscure or specific usage. The Jefferson National Forest in Virginia, while a redirect to George Washington and Jefferson National Forests , appears to be the primary topic, thus the meaning most people are intending to find. But, as it is potentially ambiguous, it would be more appropriate to place the following hatnote on George Washington and Jefferson National Forests: {{Redirect|Jefferson National Forest|the forest in Montana|Jefferson National Forest (Montana)}}. Someone searching for, clicking on, or reading Jefferson National Forest (Montana) already reasonably knows that they're on the article about the Montana forest, doesn't need to be pointed to an article about a different forest that merely shares the same name. For similar reasoning, the unambiguous "James Brown (Archdeacon of Perth)" doesn't start with "for the American funk singer, see James Brown", while the potentially ambiguous "James Brown" directs readers to the other usages at James Brown (disambiguation). Lastly, when hatnote redirects are used, only the focal article(s) should be linked, as explained at WP:HATEXTRA. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 04:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)