Talk:Jenna Haze/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Result: Delisted. Legitmate concerns, no opposition or improvements made. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Article was listed GA on January 27, 2008, and assessed against the following depreciated SNG :

WP:PORNBIO
WP:PORNSTAR

The following criteria are relevant only to people involved in pornography (and should not be raised with regard to actors and models outside the pornography industry):

• The person has won a well-known and significant industry award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration.
• The person has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography; starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; or being a member of an industry hall of fame such as the AVN Hall of Fame, XRCO Hall of Fame or equivalent.
• The person has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.

(RfC Closed 25 March 2019 Remove.)

Reassessment is now done against GA Criteria and consideration of meeting: WP:BASIC, WP:BLP, WP:NACTOR, WP:ENT, WP:GNG

---

• Lede mentions "after Missy". It is not clear whom this is referring to, when examining Reference 1
• Reference 5 does not mention Jenna Haze Darkside
• Reference 6 redirects to a default page for Excalibur Films
• Links to Jill Kelly Productions go to an article about Jill Kelly (actress). Jill Kelly Productions is one sentence on this page.
• Reference 13 is a dead link.
• Reference 16 is not a reliable source. It promotes her own website.
• Reference 31 is a dead link
• Reference 34 goes to a hijacked link.

Pageviews

• Last 90 days Pageviews: 81,525
• Daily average: 896
• Programmable Search Engine goes to Jenna Haze (lesbian) and Jenna Haze on Apple Music; a bit odd.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Paragraph 3 in Career repeats links to Jill Kelly Productions MOS:REPEATLINK states that one link is sufficient.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	See above
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See above
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Reference 14 mentions 'nomination for best feature adult entertainer' Reference 9 mentions 'Female Performer of the Year.' (2007) She wins awards for best oral sex, best group sex and Best Vignette Release. Claim to fame is the first Blu-ray release of adult material. See Reference 15 A number of adult awards in 2008, and shares 11th annual Adult Nightclub and Exotic Dancer Awards
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The focus is for adult entertainment. References don't give any work after 2009, sites like Redtube and Xtube carry her video and productions. It is difficult to ascertain what notability this person has outside an x-rated environment.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	First created in 2004, 937 editors. Page has gone to semi-protection 2014, 2015 (twice), 2018, 2020, and is still under that protection. Page Considered at risk of repeated vandalism
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Unstable page, unreliable sources reported, and lacking notability in mainstream media.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.