Talk:Jensen!

Learn more about this page

Television Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Please provide any citations per verifiability and reliable sources.
	A character or cast section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs expansion or clean up. Ideally, this section will be written in prose following the Television Manual of Style and remembering to adhere to the fiction guidelines.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.
	An episode list needs to be added to this article to improve its quality, using the {{Episode list}} template. Short lists can go in the main article, while longer lists should go in a separate List of `showname` episodes article, using other featured episode lists as an example.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Amerocentrism

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The way the Jensen English language article looks now is that the most important aspect of the program is Snoop Doggy Dog's appearance. This couldn't be further from the truth and is a gross Americo-centrism which is totally unwarranted. I wish there is a more balanced article in which the Snoop item is just one item and not 90% of the article. This is unproportionately tilted toward one single incident. werldwayd (talk) 04:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jensen!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610214012/http://gawker.com/248941/snoop-dogg-cordially-invites-bill-oreilly-to-smoke-his-pole to http://gawker.com/248941/snoop-dogg-cordially-invites-bill-oreilly-to-smoke-his-pole

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic