Talk:Jersey Airport

Merge proposal

Given that Jersey Aviation Beauport is a terminal and services located at the airport rather than a stand-alone operation it would be better merged into this article. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

• Support Merge. Beauport looks like what in the US is called a Fixed base operator. In theory it could establish its own separate notability and thus deserve its own article, but I don't see that notability established based on the current article. It would fit in just fine within the airport's article. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose. I try to start by seeing if I can find a reference before forming an opinion on questions of whether an unreferenced page is notable or not. I found an online reference in the Jersey Evening Post. So I added it as a reference to the article. With that I think the topic is notable on its own - though it also wouldn't do any harm being part of the airport article. The page could use some cleanup if left to stand on its own. Ikluft (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

• I started on that cleanup by converting the redundant Infobox Airport to Geobox Building. Ikluft (talk) 10:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Merge - although their is not a lot to salvage, really Jersey Aviation Beauport article is a about a non-notable FBO which has been padded out with airport information to make it look notable. Note that the Aviation Beauport article redirects to Jersey Aviation Beauport. Strange no real mention of the building (officialy named Beauport House)which doesnt appear to be notable either. Interestingly the Aviation Beauport article may have some merit as it is a charter operator with an ICAO code (AVB) although it has only one aircraft! Jersey Aviation Beauport appears to be a made up name for the article. MilborneOne (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Blue Islands

Have blue islands Seasonal & Charter destinations still operating or where they part of the flybe franchaise