Talk:Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Notecardforfree in topic Rescission vs. recession
![]() | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
![]() | A fact from Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rescission vs. recession
editI presume that "rescission" is actually what is meant in "... concluded that the Truth in Lending Act requires borrowers seeking recession of a loan..." and "... they were not entitled to recession", but since it's mentioned multiple times, I'm not sure. Can someone with better knowledge of law check? Daß Wölf (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are correct that "rescission" is correct, while "recession" is incorrect. I corrected the four other erroneous appearances of "recession." Thanks for catching this! -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)