Talk:Jesse Hill Jr.

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

}}

Merger proposal

edit

I propose that Jesse Hill Jr. be merged into Jesse Hill (same person). I think that the content in the Jesse Hill Jr. article is simply a less detailed account of the Jesse Hill article, and the Jesse Hill article is of a reasonable size that upon merger any non-duplicated information (such as date of death) from Jesse Hill Jr. will not cause problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Gulbenk (talk) 03:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Support - The two articles are about the same person. Jesse Hill is more developed than Jesse Hill Jr. (except for date of death and one or two references). It should be the surviving article Gulbenk (talk) 03:31, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jesse Hill Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply