Talk:Jesse L. Brown/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Don't capitalize naval unless it's a proper noun.
- Don't you mean "his"? the schools closer to this family were lower-quality
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Title capitalization in Ecker needs to be fixed. And DMY.
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk)
- Actually, your changes here made it worse. The major words of the subtitle need to be capitalized. And fix the spelling of casualties. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed it as far as I am aware of the policy (capitalized the beginning of each phrase and the proper nouns. If this isn't the correct format I don't know what is. —Ed!(talk) 00:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- You should have used Smith as your model; every significant word is capitalized, plus the first word. I did it for you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed it as far as I am aware of the policy (capitalized the beginning of each phrase and the proper nouns. If this isn't the correct format I don't know what is. —Ed!(talk) 00:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, your changes here made it worse. The major words of the subtitle need to be capitalized. And fix the spelling of casualties. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk)
- Title capitalization in Ecker needs to be fixed. And DMY.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- How could his enlistment end on 15 April and he remain in the Navy?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Fixed everything. Thanks for your review! —Ed!(talk) 19:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: