Talk:Jesse Williams (actor)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Jesse Williams (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100114010109/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i8a16efbe1212c66b7937807625f4f83e to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i8a16efbe1212c66b7937807625f4f83e
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Personal life
editIn 2017, Jesse Williams had a highly-publicized relationship with actress Minka Kelly, and yet it continues to be omitted from his Wikipedia entry. I've added this information before, but it was previously deleted on the grounds that the cited source was deemed "tabloid journalism." This time, I used an acceptable source (the New York Daily News), yet it was deleted again. An editor named 331dot gave the dubious explanation that it came from a gossip section and that such sections have fluctuating fact-checking practices. That of course is preposterous, being that the New York Daily News is a reputable publication of long standing, and as such it has uniform fact-checking standards for ALL of its sections (as any reputable publication would). Moreover, the New York Daily News has been satisfactorily cited as a source on myriad Wikipedia pages, but for some reason it's suddenly not acceptable when it comes to this high-profile, interracial relationship. Very inconsistent. Very suspect. The relationship should be included on Williams's page, as well as Kelly's page, period.
Source: https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/jesse-williams-minka-kelly-call-quits-months-article-1.3779414 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.58.239.178 (talk) 08:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/jesse-williams-relationship-with-minka-kelly-isnt-about-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.58.239.178 (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- How can gossip be fact checked? 331dot (talk) 11:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- According to WP:RSP there is not an overall consensus as to the reliability of the Daily News, and calls it tabloid journalism. 331dot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Define "consensus," especially since Wikipedia itself provided the following description: "New York Times journalist Alan Feuer said the Daily News focuses heavily on 'deep sourcing and doorstep reporting.'" I guess you'd know that if you researched anything, including your own wiki. More crackerjack editing on your part, I see. In any event, here's a new source, one that's NOT in a gossip section: https://www.thedailybeast.com/jesse-williams-relationship-with-minka-kelly-isnt-about-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.110.174.26 (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that I don't know every in and out of every possible source in all six million plus articles. I'm being civil with you, I would appreciate the same. The Daily Beast is better as a source according to WP:RSP. If you dispute the consensus regarding the Daily News, feel free to start a discussion. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)