Talk:Jessica Mauboy/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by SCB '92 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 13:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
It's hard to find flaws in this article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- no problems here
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- well there seems to be some overlinking in the main article with "lead single" and "Snoop Dogg" wikilinked more than once; there are also terms that SHOULD be wikilinked like "live album", "choir", "Tamworth", "Los Angeles", "New York"
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- no problems here
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- no problems here
- C. No original research:
- no problems here
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- no problems here
- B. Focused:
- no problems here
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- no problems here
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- no problems here
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- no problems here
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- no problems here
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- The inconsistency of wikilinking isn't a major problem, so it's a pass
- Pass or Fail:
