Talk:Jesuit High School (Beaverton, Oregon)

Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 07:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jesuit High logo.png

Image:Jesuit High logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Took care of this on the image page. cfallin|(talk) 23:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Removed several "citation needed" tags

• Choir winning Highest GPA Academic award in 2006: I was in the 2006 graduating class of Jesuit and I verify this fact first-hand (it was well-publicized at school award assemblies).

• School going coeducational in 1993: I have had family members and family friends attend the school almost continuously from the early 1970s to the present; I know the history well and, again, can personally vouch for this.

• Sports Illustrated #1 Ranking: the relevant SI article is linked at the bottom of this article; I believe the "citation needed" was never removed when the link was added.

cfallin|(talk) 09:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Please review our Wikipedia:No original research policy. If you could locate published sources which verify this information, it would be preferred. Thank you, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I've added citations for the choir claim and the coeducational claim. However, I would argue that such a policy is counterproductive when an article is edited by one who, say, has regional or community-specific knowledge on a subject that is difficult to find online in mainstream sources (such as the graduate of a high school that prides its history and tradition). cfallin|(talk) 22:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Name

I know the address is Portland, but the school is physically within the city limits of Beaverton, so should we move this to the correct qualifier in the title? Aboutmovies (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This is being discussed over here. --Esprqii (talk) 19:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Consensus of discussion, now archived at WT:WikiProject Oregon/Archive 11 § Jesuit High School (Beaverton, Oregon) or is it Portland?, what that the article name and infobox should say Beaverton since the school is physically within the Beaverton city limits, despite having a Portland mailing address. YBG (talk) 06:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Nevertheless, I think the infobox should say Portland as the way it is formattted it is clearly communicating the postal address. YBG (talk) 06:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Notable Alumni

Should David Rinella, who won a national music competition, be mentioned even though he's still a student at Jesuit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.118.92 (talk) 02:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jesuit High School (Beaverton, Oregon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526202904/http://www.ode.state.or.us/pubs/directory/school-directory-september-2008.pdf to http://www.ode.state.or.us/pubs/directory/school-directory-september-2008.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326000000/http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf to http://www.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/list-1982.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)