Talk:Jetstar/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

a330 aircraft type incorrect on wikipedia page

JQ uses A330-300 aircraft, NOT the -200 as used by QF. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.204.187 (talk) 09:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but you are wrong see here:

http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/Jetstar.htm
and here
http://www.jetstar.com/au/en/about-us/our-fleet.aspx

--121.208.230.252 (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

787 speculation

I've [deleted] speculation about the 787 fleet. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The speculation is contradicted by [this] press release. If the speculation was published somewhere by credible sources then perhaps t could be included if the sources were cited. -- Adz|talk 09:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't merge --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 01:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Proposal to Merge Jetstar Asia and Valuair

• Strong Oppose - Both are separate airlines, and besides Jetstar/Valuair are only partially owned by QF, with the rest owned by Singapore institutions. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Support, at least with respect to Jetstar/Jetstar Asia. Per the article, Qantas intends for them to have a unified brand, and eventually, operations. Valuair has to operate somewhat separately for the moment due to the Indonesian government making it difficult to transfer route authorities. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 09:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. Virgin Blue, Pacific Blue and Polynesian Blue have separate articles. Qantas and QantasLink have separate articles. Neutral on merging Valuair into Jetstar Asia (but existance of Sunstate Airlines suggests against that, too). --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. They are unified only as a Brand in order to improve schedule intergration, but they remain as separate companies. In fact, their route structure do not even link well, if at all.--Huaiwei 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. They remain as seperate airlines with seperate operating licences, ownership structures and management. The only item which is unified is the brand, not the legal entities. One is Singaporean and one is Australian.--PJD 15:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose. As per comments above. Note also existence of SkyEurope and SkyEurope Airlines Hungary separate articles. -- Adz|talk 12:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Tullamarine, Sydney, Brisbane

Jetstar does flights from Tullamarine to Sydney and Sydney to Brisbane, shouldn't it be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.176.13 (talk • contribs)

• • I'm sure you meant dont. The list is a list of Jetstar destinations in general. Also, regarding flights, Melbourne to Sydney flights I believe go through Avalon in Geelong/Outer Melbourne, and they don't fly SYD-BNE. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 23:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Asian Destinations

I don't think we should list the destinations served by Jetstar Asia and Valuair here, as long as the other two airlines have seperate articles. Links to the JQ Asia and Valuair articles should suffice. Is there any particular reason the destinations should remain here?--QFlyer 11:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree that they should be removed. This remains a group of three airlines, and the destination list should reflect it.--Huaiwei 04:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge Jetstar Asia Airways into Jetstar Airways

I propose merging Jetstar Asia Airways into this article as Jetstar and Jetstar Asia has merged their operations into one entity. Therefore, its redundant for a seperate article. All Jetstar Asia aircraft have removed the "jetstarasia.com" words on their fleet. Jetstarasia.com now redirects you to here and all operations are unified now. Feel free to comment on this merger. Terence Ong 14:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Please see earlier merge request in this page. The circumstance has not changed since then, and the concensus stays.--Huaiwei 16:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. The brand may be integrated but operations are still independent as they have been to date. The article (and moreso orange star) needs a cleanup but irrespective of that, the two Jetstar's are operating as different entities. Jetstar is a wholly owned subsidiary of Qantas, Jetstar Asia's ownership (via Orange Star) is decidedly more diverse. skyskraper 16:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for adding those merge tags - I thought I could help out, but I didn't look here first :) Social Studiously 11:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jetstar logo.png

Image:Jetstar logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)