Wikipedia

Talk:Jewish Babylonian Aramaic

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Andrevan in topic Incorrect script use, possible falsification of the „microlanguage“ name.
Learn more about this page

Untitled Section

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article isn't very good.


However, the majority of those who are familiar with it, namely Orthodox Jewish students of Talmud, are given no systematic instruction in the language, and are expected to "sink or swim" in the course of Talmudic studies, with the help of some informal pointers showing similarities and differences with Hebrew. For this reason, insights based on grammar or philology tend to be received with bewilderment in Orthodox Talmudic circles (see Chaim Potok's novels The Chosen and The Promise).

No footnotes or references (other than two of Chaim Potok's works of fiction...without page numbers I might add). How about some substantive footnotes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tal0687 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Three of this articles four inline citations reference Wikipedia pages. There are some interesting claims in the article like "However, the majority of those who are familiar with it, namely Orthodox Jewish students of Talmud, are given no systematic instruction in the language, and are expected to "sink or swim" in the course of Talmudic studies". The citation at the end links to similarities between the languages but spends most of the article talking about how different the dialects are. The only sentence in the article which supports "with the help of some informal pointers showing similarities and differences with Hebrew." is "I knew a fair amount of Hebrew when we came to Israel because it was taught in our Jewish schools. And partly thanks to my Aramaic, I was able to speak like a sabra in no time." which still doesn't mesh with the "sink or swim" part.

Suggest adding citations, perhaps by someone has access to material noted in the bibliography? Chrissd21 (talk) 09:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I realise it's a "Start Class" article but the 4th citation isn't what is stated in the article and the other references aren't actually references, just wiki links which lead to redirects. It's possible they're citing a paper but they would need to be a tad more specific than author-year. Chrissd21 (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

a reverted, possibly good edit

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

this revert have erased good content. i am pretty buusy so i don't have the time to go over the edit and put back accurate content. i'd be grateful if someone would take on himself the mission. thanks ahead. melo kol haaretz kevodi (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

user:מלא כל הארץ כבודי Look at the book of Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1. The content is based on this book. It is all right. I don't understand the action of this german user --EthanLc (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Schulhofpassage admitted he dosen't know if the informaion that he erased is correct. And i believe if someone makes sure it's accurate he'll aprove putting it back. I myself don't have time to check but i asked in the Hebrew wiki for someone to go over it. melo kol haaretz kevodi (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@melo kol haaretz kevodi: Note that user EthanLc is also a sockpuppet of Messina, the same user that added the information to the article. But you are correct, if a trustworthy user verifies the additions I've got nothing against putting them back. --Schulhofpassage (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Schulhofpassage i assumed that was the case. That's why i said "someone" and not "you". melo kol haaretz kevodi (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

en:Jewish Babylonian Aramaic Why [1] [2] this revert again by german user ? Please help

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am Talmud student. I benefited from the english article "Jewish Babylonian Aramaic". Why this revert again by de:user:schulhofpassage ? without knowledge in Jewish Babylonian Aramaic I can not read the Talmud Babli. Please help --PoelP (talk) 05:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Noun singular/plural


noun: singular[1]
Jewish Babylonian Aramaic example Hebrew parallel English translation
of the jewish babylonian aramaic example
מַלְכָּא (malk-a) [2] המֶלֶךְ (ha-melekh)[3] the king[4]
עָלְמָא (alm-a)[5] העוֹלָם (ha-olam)[6] the world[7]
מְדִינְתָא (medin-ta)[8] המְדִינָה (ha-medina)[9] the state[10]
מְנָא הָא מִילְּתָא דְּאָמְרִי אֱנָשֵׁי (mil-ta)[11] מִנַּיִין מִלָּה זֹאת שֶׁאוֹמְרִים אֲנָשִׁים (ha-mila) the word/thing[12]


noun: plural[13]
Jewish Babylonian Aramaic example Hebrew parallel English translation
of the jewish babylonian aramaic example
מַלְכֵי (malkheji)/ מַלְכַיָּא (malkh-ajia)[14][15] המְלָכִים (ha-melakhim)[16] the kings[17]
עָלְמֵי (almeji)/ עָלְמַיָּא (alm-ajia)[18] העוֹלָמים (ha-olamim) [19] the worlds[20]
מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי (mil-eji)[21] מִנַּיִין המִילִּים האֵלֶּה (ha-milim) the words/things


Idiom
Idiom
Jewish Babylonian Aramaic example Hebrew parallel English translation
of the jewish babylonian aramaic example
קָאֵים
(qa'em)[22] 		- "rising, standing, referring to"[23]
קָאֵים - קָא
(qa) [24] 		- - [25]
מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן
(mai qa mashma lan) [26] 		מָה מַשְׁמִיעַ לָנּוּ
(ma mashma lanu) 		"What new point is he teaching us "[27]
מַאי קָאָמַר
(mai qa'amar )[28] 		מָה הוּא אוֹמֵר
(ma hu omer) 		"What does he mean "[29]
תָּנוּ רַבָּנָן
(tanu rabanan)[30] 		שָׁנוּ חֲכָמִים
(shanu khakhamim) 		"the rabbis taught"[31]


מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי
(mena hane mileji)[32] 		מִנַּיִין המִילִּים האֵלֶּה
(minajin ha-milim ha-ele) 		"What is the source"[33]
  1. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231-232.
  2. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  3. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  4. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  5. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  6. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  7. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  8. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  9. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 232.
  10. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 232.
  11. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 178:From where is the maxim that people say?
  12. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  13. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231-232.
  14. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 233: ...in the plural of masculine nouns ... construct forms such as מַלְכֵי are often used not only in the construct state but even in the absolute and emphatic states. Thus, in Babylonian Aramaic, the form מַלְכֵי may mean either the kings of or kings or the kings.
  15. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  16. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  17. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 233.
  18. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  19. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  20. ^ Yitzhak Frank: Grammar for Gemara and targum onkelos: An Introduction to Aramaic, Ariel Institute, Jerusalem 2011 ISBN 978-1-59826-466-1,p. 231.
  21. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 178:From where do we derive these things?
  22. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 230.
  23. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 230: "This participle is often used with a word that has a prepositional prefix - אֵי, to mean basing oneself upon or referring to."
  24. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 229.
  25. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 229: " A contraction of the participle קָאֵים (from the root קום ) is often placed before another participle...it has an emphatic effect that is difficult to translate into english ."
  26. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 153.
  27. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 153: "What new point is he teaching us? This question points out a difficulty: Since the amora's halakha was already known to us from a mishna, a baraita, or the amora's own statement on another occasion - why did the amora present it again?"
  28. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 152.
  29. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 152: "What does he mean? This question seeks a clarification of the meaning of a mishna, a baraitha, an amoraic statement, or a pasuk."
  30. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 260.
  31. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 260: "the hakhamim taught. This expression usually introduces a baraitha that begins with an anonymous statement."
  32. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, p. 178.
  33. ^ Yitzhak Frank:The Practical Talmud Dictionary, Jerusalem 2001, s. p.178: "From where do we derive these things? What is the source? This question seeks a source for a statement in a mishna, in a baraitha, or by an amora."
please help
user:מלא כל הארץ כבודי
user:Meni yuzevich.
Thank you --05:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Law French and other dubious content

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I do not know every single book and article about Jewish Babylonian Aramaic, but enough to doubt the passage on vernacular, Law French, and so on. I have no idea where the comparison to Law French comes from, but I have to assume original research. On the contrary, the apocopated and syncopated forms, the loss of pharyngeals, and so on are signs of a vernacular (whereas Syriac, for instance, kept the letters that are not pronounced and are therefore not written in Mandaic and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic). The sentence about the influence on modern Hebrew is questionable, too. Various dialects of Aramaic have left their mark, from ancient Hebrew (archaic poetry [depending on which scholar you ask and how you interpret things], post-exile books of the Bible [no doubt about those]) to Amoraic Hebrew (Galilean or Babylonian Aramaic influences depending on origin, obviously), but the way the sentence is written implies these terms have influenced modern Hebrew as a language, which is a dubious claim. Some terms like those mentioned here are listed in Hebrew and Yiddish dictionaries though, but still the sentence has to be changed. --46.114.4.117 (talk) 20:59, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Play with your friend

edit
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

4 174.50.217.56 (talk) 12:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect script use, possible falsification of the „microlanguage“ name.

edit
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I don’t think Babylonian Aramaic could be labelled as Jewish, there was probably no Jewish speakers at the time (haven’t checked sources) and Aramaic is pretty distinct from Jewish languages. The language was spoken/written in southern and central Iraq as claimed in the article. Should it be named as Babylonian Aramaic instead of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic? It also appears that an incorrect text script was used to display the name of the language in Aramaic. Vofa (talk) 11:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I suggest you check sources and/or read the article. GordonGlottal (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed with Gordon. Andre🚐 20:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jewish_Babylonian_Aramaic&oldid=1249905817"