Talk:Jewish Social Democratic Party in Galicia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

1911

edit

This statement in the article does not make sense: "In 1911 the Jewish Social Democracy in Galicia, the Jewish affiliate section of the PSDP, merged into the JSDP." JSDP was not an affiliate fo the PSDP, but a breakaway from it, and it could not have merged with itself... What's going on? BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, Kuhn's book on Grossman says "The Fifth Congress [in 1911] confirmed the fusion of the JSDP and the PPSD's small Jewish Social Democracy", which led to the JSDP dropping its demand for Jewish cultural national autonomy.BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewish Social Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply