Talk:JezzBall

Reversion

Because I failed to properly list rationales for the numerous fair use images included in this article, the photos were subsequently deleted, and when that was done, contributors edited out almost the entire article, as it dealt too heavily in the gaming strategy, I suppose, to allow it to remain without the screenshot images.

Please feel free to edit this article, and I apologize to those whose edits since the removal of these images and related text are now gone, but the article is a much stronger one now, providing a more comprehensive discussion about what the game is and how to play it. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

There are points where your revision of the article is superior to what you overwrote, but there are others where it seems not to maintain a neutral POV. Also, the large tactics section reads more like a strategy guide than encyclopedic content. Article's still in need of some cleanup. MrZaius^talk 20:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I had nothing to do with the "Clones" section, and for all I care, it can be entirely redone to suit Wiki standards as you or anyone else perceives them. As far as the strategy guide comment...i'll see what i can do to touch it up. Thanx. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 19:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Original research

• An interested party should probably go through and remove the unsourceable material. The tactics section is especially bad... Wickethewok 17:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The original author of said content rather vociferously defended it when it was removed before, but perhaps it's time to broach the subject again. Would it do any harm to move the strategy-guide like content to Wikibooks, resolving the Wikipedia:Original research concerns? MrZaius^talk 18:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

If you guys wanted a response, you should have dropped me a line -- I don't tag pages and I just happened by again and saw this. Nostalgically, I think the current content is fantastic...but as far as OR concerns go, perhaps none of it belongs. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Good Job!

Good job to the recent editors in removing my previous violations of OR and reformatting! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Similarity to Windows Vista's InkBall?

The article in question: InkBall.

Is this noteworthy? --rjcuk (talk) 23:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)