Talk:Jiangyan High School
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
mu?
editNot taking any part in naming convention conflicts, I still think the "mu" unit deserves to also be expressed in SI and linked. But since other editors seem to be happily reverting eachother on this I don't change it myself... highlunder 15:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Assess
editA good start but the English needs a lot of work hence the stub rating rather than start class. This seems like a potentially very important school. Please tell us more. Dahliarose 13:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
I performed copy editing on this page. More needs to be done for clarification. Additionally, it gets a bit confusing (I think) to refer to the school as a high school and as a middle school throughout. There were some lines which I left in but probably should have removed. I wasn't able to decipher the true message, but hope that someone else can. Thanks.Jihadcola (talk) 00:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jiangyan High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425235832/http://www.jyzx.org/jz70/ to http://www.jyzx.org/jz70/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)