Talk:Jiaolong

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jiaolong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026155019/http://fax.libs.uga.edu/GR830xD7xV8/ to http://fax.libs.uga.edu/GR830xD7xV8/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citation format

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Kiyoweap, thanks for your improvements to this article. However, I wish you had known about the WP:CITEVAR convention and first discussed changing the existing in-line Harvard citations to footnotes. What would be the easiest way to revert the footnoting while keeping your other edits? Keahapana (talk) 00:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Keahapana. Well, I did initially try to maintain your style of referencing. But just too many unreferenced material need[ed] fixing.

My judgment call was using footnote style in order to maintain readability within ordinary amount of effort. I think most reasonable editors would agree.

If you disagree, I suppose you can demonstrate by converting them to the citation style you want to preserve. I just don't see this as practicable.

But I am not about to remove material that are matters of WP:Verifiability and WP:No Original Research policy on grounds of a WP:CITEVAR guideline issues. --Kiyoweap (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic