GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 18:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Genie.P, I am very sorry but this article does not meet the criteria for a Good Article in its current state. Although it is interesting and well-referenced, the grammar and writing style are far below the standard of what would be expected for a Good Article. I recommend you submit a request for a copy-edit at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests, or reach out to an interested editor with a stronger proficiency in English to review the prose.
I will put this nomination on hold for a week to wait for your response. I would be happy to review this once the prose has been corrected. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- As the contributing editor has not edited since June 25, and has not responded to this GA, I am failing it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry about replying your message. I had been a long summer vacation on July, August. So I couldn't noticed your message. Anyway I'm a beginner of Wikipedia. Still do I have a chance ? Really appreciate your replying ^^ Genie.P (talk) 03:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)