A fact from Jiggs II appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Footnote b requires a cite for the second sentence.
There is quite a bit of information in the infobox which is not in the main article. My (and Wikipedia's) strong preference is for the information in the infobox to be duplicated in the article, the infobox is supposed to be an at-a-glance summary of the article. If not, could you source information in the infobox which is not already in the article.
You mention the disagreeable behaviour of Private Pagett in the lead but not in the article. The lead should be a summary of information contained in the article.
That's a fine piece of work. Very solidly referenced, and dryly amusing. GA.
For me, less is more re images. Your change improves the whole look of the article.
Suggestion. You may want to change the "175px" to "upright=0.75" (or whatever size you fancy) to comply with MOS:IMGSIZE. This will allow the image size to vary according to what readers have set as their preferences.
It works on my laptop, iPad and iPhone, but I can see how it could sandwich between the infobox and the images. Maybe try sliding the left aligned images down as far as they will go and see what Catriona thinks? Gog the Mild (talk) 03:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
