Talk:Jim Geraghty

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jim Geraghty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

from Vfd

On 25 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep, and merge from Jim geraghty. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jim Geraghty and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jim geraghty for records of the discussions.

Killian documents

User:Gamaliel removed "Geraghty was actively involved in reporting the Killian documents and Rathergate story on a daily basis on behalf of National Review Online. Geraghty was one of the self described Pajamahadeen."

I certainly had the impression that TKS was a go-to site for updates on this story. "The Kerry Spot" was explicitly focused on campaign issues. —wwoods 17:20, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It was most definitely one of the go-to sites for the story. Gamaliel has raised this issue repeatedly that Geraghty did not have significant involvement, but a review of Geraghty's archives show he was very much involved in reporting the story. Gamaliel is right that Geraghty did not break the story, but he was reporting on it within a day of the 60 Minutes II show and reported on it on a daily (sometimes hourly) basis when it broke. Geraghty contines to report about it now with Rather's retirement

2007

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was rather out of date. I've done a quick edit, but more (and better) work is needed.

While checking Amazon for books by "Jim Geraghty", I found CICS Concepts and Uses (Mcgraw Hill, 1993, ISBN 0077077512). Does anyone know whether it's by this Jim Geraghty? Cheers, CWC 13:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jim Geraghty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic