Talk:Jim Sasser
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editGore Sr. wasn't much of a suppoter of Civil Rights, his and his son's assertions to the contrary. He didn't vote for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlquall (talk • contribs) 20:31, 10 August 2004 (UTC)
- As I recall Gore Sr. helped filibuster the Civil Rights Act of 64. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.33.83.221 (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Chinese?
editWhy the Chinese version of his name? 64.122.95.110 19:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Sasser served as US ambassador to China at one point, so I guess it's in line with that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.82.102.234 (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
NPOV
editI came here to learn the background of this gentleman, and find the following line in second para:
"Hooker, of course, has since become a somewhat laughable perennial candidate and gadfly (social). "
Says who? I've deleted this line as it is presumptive and hardly NPOV, and so I flagged this whole artice as NPOV. I cannot read this article without questioning almost every statement, but I don't have the knowledge to fix it.
More examples in question:
The phrase "his (intermittent) wealth" is not cited or explained.
"At this time, Sasser seemed to be one of the Democratic party's brighter Senate stars," says who? Again this is not NPOV.
"Another factor in Frist's favor was that Sasser was never seen as possessing much charisma of his own." Please!
This whole article really needs an NPOV makeover!
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Senate Accomplishments
editThe portion of the Accomplishments section shown below is problematic. Budget bills are good for one year only, by law, so no budget can do anything over ten years.
"And in 1993, he engineered passage of President Bill Clinton's first budget, which reduced the deficit by $500 billion dollars over 10 years, but passed without any Republican votes."
I think the revision below is warranted.
"And in 1993, he engineered passage of President Bill Clinton's first budget, which passed without any Republican votes." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markjmillan (talk • contribs) 22:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- While the terminology of "budget" may be in question, Congress and the President can agree to make spending cuts over a period of time, and the intention of the passage is completely accurate. I added the following references to the article:
- Clinton and House Democrats Agree On Spending Cuts, but Ante Is Raised, the New York Times.
- Clinton to Cut Spending Further, the Washington Post. ThompsonJ54 (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jim Sasser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060211043900/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_n4_v16/ai_16946739 to http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_n4_v16/ai_16946739
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)